A 'unity' government would block the reforms Israel desperately needs – opinion
Benny Gantz should heed his favorite slogan that saving the country is the most important thing of all, abandoning the naive notion of unity that will saddle the state with more Likud years
The article argues against forming a "unity" government in Israel, asserting that such a government would hinder necessary reforms. The author contends that the concept of all major parties participating in government, often promoted by the right-wing, lacks basis in serious democracies. The piece highlights that when Benjamin Netanyahu formed governments, he did not invite opponents, and his camp did not deem this anti-democratic. The author states, "No democracy allots the opposition and the coalition equal governing power." The article suggests that a unity government would grant veto power to the very movement whose policies the electorate might have rejected, thereby blocking crucial changes needed for Israel's democratic institutions, international standing, economy, and the relationship between religion and state. It emphasizes that elections should allow societies to impose consequences on parties that govern poorly, advocating for a clear distinction between the governing coalition and the opposition to enable effective governance and reform, particularly regarding the ultra-Orthodox community's integration into the economy and society.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.