ADL and JCPA reactions to US teachers union exposes divide on how to fight antisemitism

A public disagreement has emerged between the Jewish Council of Public Affairs (JCPA) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) regarding the most effective strategy to combat antisemitism within schools and unions, particularly concerning the National Education Association (NEA). The dispute arose after Jewish teachers reported antisemitic harassment at last year's NEA convention.

• The JCPA, in collaboration with the NEA's Jewish Affairs Caucus, announced new rules and policies designed to protect Jewish members while upholding free speech, emphasizing a collaborative approach with union leaders. Amy Spitalnick, CEO of JCPA, stated, "When you can’t criticize substance, you find reasons to criticize process."
• The ADL, however, expressed "extreme frustration" with this agreement, claiming it was reached without full leadership and delegate involvement from the NEA Jewish Affairs Caucus. The ADL criticized NEA's "inconsistent enforcement of its own protections," asserting that "Jewish educators are not a priority."
• This divergence highlights a broader tension: whether to prioritize collaboration with institutions or confront them over their shortcomings. The ADL has adopted a more confrontational stance, while the JCPA advocates for working directly with leaders.
• Despite their differing approaches, both organizations had previously united in expressing "deep concerns about the growing level of antisemitic activity within teachers’ unions" following last year's convention.