AIPAC is the top issue at final primary debate between Stevens and El-Sayed in Michigan
The repeated invoking of the pro-Israel group was a symbol of how toxic the lobbyist’s brand has become to the Democratic electorate in certain races.
The final Democratic primary debate in Michigan between US Rep. Haley Stevens and former county health official Abdul El-Sayed was dominated by discussions surrounding the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). El-Sayed criticized Stevens for accepting significant financial support from AIPAC, alleging it would influence her votes, particularly regarding aid to Israel. He stated, "They've set a record in this race to help elect my opponent because they know that she'll be a reliable vote." Stevens, while repeatedly pressed on her relationship with AIPAC, emphasized her transparency and her pride in representing a large Jewish population, stating, "I am deeply proud to represent one of the largest Jewish populations in a congressional district in the country." She also deflected by noting super PAC spending for El-Sayed. The debate highlighted the contentious role of pro-Israel lobbying in Democratic primaries, with AIPAC's spending for Stevens estimated to be the largest ever in a single campaign.
The summary and context on this page were written by the Din Online desk based on the original article; any quotes are from the source. The full article and all rights to it remain with the source. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.