יום רביעי, אוגוסט 26, 2026 עברית|English Log in Free sign-up
LIVE
Man who attacked Jerusalem nun acquitted due to mental illness, hospitalized for up to six yearsSome music 'Hits Different': Harvard study shows link between music and fatal car accidents in USUS water sector supplier hack draws FBI scrutiny as Iran-linked cyber concerns grow‘The Torah strengthens the spirit’: IDF Chief’s message to yeshiva studentsIsrael, the DEI exception to 'everyone': How the music industry lost its moral compass – opinion'He's from Muslim Brotherhood': Otzma Yehudit calls to bar Ra'am MK Abbas from Knesset electionsDozens of cardiologists may have skipped internal medicine training, falsified records – report‘Brazen mockery’: Justice Amit’s ‘two phones’ remark sparks haredi uproarBank Mizrahi employee moderately injured in criminal stabbing attack in Tel Aviv, suspect arrestedNetanyahu weighs rotation gov't with Eisenkot amid fears of not securing majority bloc in KnessetYair Netanyahu criticizes Winter's new party as reports emerge over connection with PMAnti-AIPAC, anti-Israel platforms take center stage as progressive wins Oklahoma Democratic primaryMan who attacked Jerusalem nun acquitted due to mental illness, hospitalized for up to six yearsSome music 'Hits Different': Harvard study shows link between music and fatal car accidents in USUS water sector supplier hack draws FBI scrutiny as Iran-linked cyber concerns grow‘The Torah strengthens the spirit’: IDF Chief’s message to yeshiva studentsIsrael, the DEI exception to 'everyone': How the music industry lost its moral compass – opinion'He's from Muslim Brotherhood': Otzma Yehudit calls to bar Ra'am MK Abbas from Knesset electionsDozens of cardiologists may have skipped internal medicine training, falsified records – report‘Brazen mockery’: Justice Amit’s ‘two phones’ remark sparks haredi uproarBank Mizrahi employee moderately injured in criminal stabbing attack in Tel Aviv, suspect arrestedNetanyahu weighs rotation gov't with Eisenkot amid fears of not securing majority bloc in KnessetYair Netanyahu criticizes Winter's new party as reports emerge over connection with PMAnti-AIPAC, anti-Israel platforms take center stage as progressive wins Oklahoma Democratic primary
World

AIPAC promotes left-wing issues … and gets attacked by the left

אוג 18, 2026 ·  Source: JNS 80Objectivity score80/100

AIPAC promotes left-wing issues … and gets attacked by the left

Netanyahu AIPAC
Morton A. Klein
Morton A. Klein

It was painful to see that in response to Thomas L. Friedman’s article in The New York Times criticizing AIPAC, the Jewish lobby group showed support for left-wing positions when, instead, strength and pride were needed.

In a response to a post on X, AIPAC supported creating a Palestinian state, even though, especially after the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, it is widely understood that such a state would inevitably become a Hamas-Fatah-Hezbollah terror garrison that endangers Israel’s existence, and launches nonstop terror and rocket attacks on all of Israel.

AIPAC disregarded Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s strong opposition to a Palestinian state. And it disregarded that the Israeli Jewish public opposes a Palestinian state, 10-1 (79% to 8%).

It also disregarded the fact that Israel’s Knesset overwhelmingly voted to oppose a Palestinian state. The Knesset declared that such an entity “would pose an existential danger to the State of Israel and its citizens, perpetuate the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and destabilize the region,” and be quickly taken over by Hamas and reward terror. (Only the nine Arab members of the Knesset voted against the declaration.)

AIPAC also disregarded, at a meeting last year of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, that Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar urged U.S. organizations to publicly oppose the creation of a Palestinian state as an existential danger.

Notably, in the same post, AIPAC stated that it “respect[s] Israel’s democracy and the rights of its citizens to choose their leaders.”

How can it state this when it disregards and opposes the most basic determination by Israel’s people and government that a Palestinian state endangers Israel’s very existence?

As a member of AIPAC’s executive committee, when I have asked AIPAC to oppose dangerous moves, such as Israel’s disengagement from the Gaza Strip in 2005, its leaders repeatedly replied that it “supports the position of the democratically elected government of Israel.”

AIPAC often stated that (prior) Israeli government support for the Oslo Accords and Gaza withdrawal, both of which ended up as disasters, is why it lent its support to those policies. In response to my opposition and that of the Zionist Organization of America to these harmful moves, AIPAC urged support for the Israeli government’s policies. “Don’t make your own Shabbos!” one AIPAC chairman screamed at me.

Unfortunately, when the position of Israel’s democratically elected government is not on the left, AIPAC hasn’t lent its help. For instance, it has regularly pushed to insert support for a Palestinian state into otherwise pro-Israel legislation.

Further, in its post on X, AIPAC again failed, as it has for decades, to support the right of over 600,000 Jews to live in the Jewish people’s lawful historic homelands of Judea and Samaria. Instead, AIPAC stated: “We’ve long said [that Israeli settlements] must be addressed in direct talks for a two-state agreement.”

AIPAC has also told members of U.S. Congress that it takes “no position” about Jewish rights in Judea and Samaria. Of course, “no position” makes it clear to legislators and others that the group is uncomfortable with asserting the rights of the Jewish people to live and build there.

AIPAC also asserted in its post on X that “one can love Israel and oppose its leader.” This statement legitimized attacks on Netanyahu, which are used as a coded method of attacking all of Israel. In an era when Israel’s prime minister is regularly vilified, AIPAC sent a wrong and dangerous message.

Too often, it has taken additional problematic positions.

For instance, it needlessly watered down the Taylor Force Act to obtain a few unneeded Democratic votes, thereby enabling continuing some U.S. funding to the Palestinian Authority while the P.A. continues its policy of paying terrorists to murder Jews and Christians.

AIPAC also supported the disastrous decision in 2015 to allow the Iran nuclear deal to be approved by a minority of Congress members (instead of following the constitutional requirement of requiring two-thirds of the Senate to ratify the agreement) and continued to support those in Congress who supported the ensuing disastrous agreement, which, in effect, has led to the current conflict with Iran.

AIPAC has now made its left-leaning opposition to the Israeli people and government’s positions clear: In its post on X (and on its website), AIPAC declared that it “take[s] no direction … from the Israeli government.”

That’s a marked change from its tagline of “the pro-Israel lobby.” This should not be the response to the far-left antisemitic mob or to The New York Times. AIPAC needs to be an unashamed, courageous, strong pro-Israel voice in the halls of Congress and elsewhere.

On a more positive note, AIPAC has strongly contributed to defeating many congressional candidates hostile to Israel and continues to bring legislators to Israel. Also, its post included a paragraph calling for Palestinians and Arab partners to disarm Hamas in Gaza, and Palestinian terrorist groups in Judea and Samaria (which AIPAC alas misnamed the “West Bank”); reform the corrupt P.A.; end the glorification of violence and terrorism; and build a functioning society that isn’t dependent on U.N.-associated agencies.

If AIPAC’s policy statements were limited to these important demands, then its X post would have been fine.

Supporting left-wing policies and proclaiming that it doesn’t take into account what Israel wants will not deter Israel-bashers from attacking AIPAC. And so, the group will continue to be attacked because of the left’s hatred of the Jewish people and the Jewish state. It will be attacked simply because it is a Jewish group that supports the Jewish people’s right to defend itself and to live in the one Jewish state on the planet.

As British statesman Winston Churchill said: “Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last.”

Mali and Liel Yahalomi after being located in Argentina. Credit: Israel Police Spokesperson's Unit.
Former Italian Prime Minister and Five Star Movement President Giuseppe Conte participates in the "Truth Day" event of the newspaper La Verità at the Roman Aquarium, June 23, 2026, in Rome, Italy. Photo by Simona Granati-Corbis/Corbis via Getty Images.
“The Guardian News” website homepage on a tablet. Credit: Anton Garin/Shutterstock.

Get the latest updates in our WhatsApp group.

Election, Ballot
Likud party members are seen at a polling station in Jerusalem on Aug. 17, 2026, as party members vote in the Likud primary elections to determine the party’s Knesset list ahead of the Israeli general elections. Photo by Chaim Goldberg/Flash90.
Likud Party members vote in the primary, in Tel Aviv, Aug. 17, 2026. Photo by Avshalom Sassoni/Flash90.
A grade 11 Saudi textbook highlights agreements between Muhammad with Jews and Christians. Credit: IMPACT-se.
Jared Kushner delivers a statement to the media alongside U.S. Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff and U.S. Vice President JD Vance, near Kiryat Gat, on Oct. 21, 2025. Photo by Chaim Goldberg/Flash90.
Thane Rosenbaum. Credit: Courtesy.
Daniel (“Danny”) Seaman. Credit: Courtesy.
💬 Want to join the discussion and comment? Sign up — free, and get the weekly digest too.
🗞️ In-depth summary

The article criticizes AIPAC for adopting left-wing positions, particularly its support for a Palestinian state, despite strong opposition from the Israeli government and public, especially after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks. The author argues that AIPAC has disregarded the Knesset's declaration that a Palestinian state would pose an "existential danger to the State of Israel." The piece highlights AIPAC's past support for policies like the Oslo Accords and Gaza disengagement, which the author deems disastrous, and its current stance of not taking direction from the Israeli government. The author also points out AIPAC's failure to support Jewish rights in Judea and Samaria and its statement that "one can love Israel and oppose its leader," which is seen as legitimizing attacks on Prime Minister Netanyahu. While acknowledging AIPAC's positive contributions in defeating anti-Israel congressional candidates, the article concludes that its left-leaning policies will not deter attacks from those hostile to Israel.

Automatically generated summary based on the original article; quotes are from the source.
This story is based on reporting by JNS.
Read the full article at the source →
🏷

© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.

Related

Discussion

No comments yet — be the first to comment.

Add a comment