Don’t trust Doha when it comes to US-Iran negotiations
There are multiple reasons why selecting Qatar as a negotiator for U.S.-Iranian talks is problematic. For starters, it has constantly supported Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood financially and politically over the years, which means that their ideology slants in favor of radical Islam and not towards the West.For years, Qatar has tried to project itself as a mid-size power, but it does not have all of the necessary means to be one. It is a small country with a small population and lacks the mandate to speak for Arab countries.Yet since the Arab Spring of 2011, Doha has been pushing to be involved in the internal affairs of Libya, Tunisia, and especially Egypt, despite the fact that influential Arab powers such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt were clearly against Qatar’s ambition.Since the aftermath of the Arab Spring and following the fall of former Egyptian President Mohamed…
The article argues that Qatar is an unsuitable mediator for U.S.-Iranian negotiations due to its historical support for radical Islamist groups like Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. It asserts that Qatar's mediation efforts are biased, aiming to protect Iran from further setbacks and support radical Islam, rather than facilitating genuine peace. The author highlights Qatar's long-standing financial and political backing of Hamas, including hosting its political office in Doha since 2012 and transferring over $1.8 billion to Gaza, primarily benefiting Hamas. The article also notes that Iran, a Shia country, supports Hamas against Israel when it serves its interests, as evidenced by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's praise for the October 7, 2023 attacks. The author questions Qatar's intentions, pointing out its past alignment with Iran when other Arab nations blockaded it for supporting the Muslim Brotherhood. The piece concludes that trusting Qatar as an honest broker is difficult given its agenda, which appears to aid the Iranian regime, and suggests that the goal should be to weaken the regime rather than offer it a lifeline through negotiations.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.