New scrutiny over 'NY Times' Gaza coverage in journal article
The scholarly study found a dominant narrative that placed "near-exclusive agency and responsibility" on Israel while downplaying Hamas’s role in the conflict.
A study published on September 7 in the journal Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, conducted by Edieal Pinker of the Yale School of Management, scrutinizes The New York Times' coverage of the Gaza war between October 7, 2023, and June 7, 2024. The study, which analyzed 1,559 articles, found that the Times' reporting presented a "distorted view of the conflict," emphasizing Palestinian suffering, casualties, and Gaza's destruction while downplaying Israeli suffering and Hamas's role.
- The research indicates a "dominant narrative consistent with a framing that assigns near-exclusive agency and responsibility to Israel while diminishing Hamas’s role in sustaining the conflict."
- While Hamas was initially depicted as the perpetrator on October 7, subsequent reporting portrayed Israel as "the sole aggressor," consistently diminishing Hamas's involvement beyond the initial attack.
- The study notes frequent mentions of Israeli violence and infrequent inclusion of Palestinian violence, with personal accounts of Palestinian suffering appearing two out of every three days, while comparable Israeli accounts were rare.
- Former U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee criticized the Times' bias, while the Times stated it "has covered this war with more rigor than virtually any other U.S. news organization." Pinker, however, suggests the imbalances in reporting could sway reader opinions "in a direction that is at odds with reality."
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.