Palestinian Authority employed Hamas's Oct. 7 planners, study finds

The Palestinian Authority’s “pay-for-slay” program helped make the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack possible. That is the contention of a July 30 study by the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCFA), which concluded that the P.A.’s policy of financially supporting terrorists “materially facilitated” Hamas’s ability to “prepare for and execute” the massacre.

The P.A. “pay-for-slay” program provided indirect support for Oct. 7, IDF Lt. Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch, author of the study and the director of the JCFA’s Palestinian Authority Accountability Initiative, told JNS.

Sponsored Review: Scyrox V8S Ultra-Light Wireless Gaming Mouse AliExpress See the review →

His report, titled “Did the PA’s ‘Pay-for-Slay’ Policy Facilitate the October 7 Massacre?” caught the attention of Israel’s Foreign Ministry. “The Palestinian Authority’s pay-for-slay policy helped bankroll Hamas’s future leadership,” the ministry posted to its X account.

The Palestinian Authority’s pay-for-slay policy helped bankroll Hamas’s future leadership.A new study finds it paid hundreds of millions to released terrorists – including those who went on to plan and lead the October 7 massacre.https://t.co/bFz5dXupLy

The study focused on terrorists released in the 2011 Shalit deal. In that prisoner-exchange, 1,027 terrorists were set free to secure the release of IDF soldier Gilad Shalit, who was captured in a Hamas cross-border raid in 2006.

Of those, several hundred were released to their homes in the Gaza Strip. Many of them would arrange and carry out the massacre, including Yahya Sinwar, the head of Hamas and the mastermind of Oct. 7.

All were eligible to receive payments from the P.A. as “employees,” a reward for their terrorist activities. “If the terrorists were required to actually work, instead of living on the P.A./PLO terror payments, they would not have been able to dedicate themselves to planning and executing the massacre,” Hirsch wrote in his report.

P.A. responsibility for the Oct. 7 massacre goes beyond “general incitement and promotion of terror,” and the “ex post facto ratification” of terrorist attacks through pay-for-slay payments, he said. “Rather, the P.A./PLO’s responsibility for the Oct. 7 massacre also rests on the fact that they employed terrorists, simply for being terrorists, and those terrorists, while in the employ of the P.A., carried out the massacre.”

Zaher Jabarin, Rawhi Mushtaha and Tawfiq Abu Naim were all involved in the planning, directing, financing and carrying out of the Oct.7 massacre.

Jabarin was dubbed the “CEO of Hamas” by The Wall Street Journal in January 2024 for his role in securing the funds to attack Israel. He served 18 years of a life sentence prior to the Shalit deal. Exiled, he is based in Turkey.

Mushtaha, Sinwar’s right-hand man at the time of the Oct. 7 massacre, served 23 years of his four life sentences.

Abu Naim served 22 years in prison. He headed Hamas’s internal security force during the Oct. 7 massacre.

Their many years in Israeli prison before their release in the Shalit deal entitled them to senior P.A. positions with commensurate salaries.

Another terrorist, Wessam Farhat, spent 10 years in prison. He, too, was entitled to P.A. remuneration, though not at the same pay scale as the others. He helped plan Oct. 7 and directed Nukhba Force terrorists to infiltrate the Nahal Oz kibbutz and an IDF post.

Mushtaha, Abu Naim and Farhat were eliminated in Israeli airstrikes. Only Jabarin remains alive. “He is currently tasked with implementing the decision to resume suicide attacks within Israel,” Hirsch said.

While Hirsch can’t show P.A. pay slips for Sinwar and the others, all indications point to their having received payments. According to Palestinian law, every released terrorist is entitled to remuneration without exception—a fact P.A. officials admitted to Hirsch, an attorney, upon cross-examination in Israeli courts.

Further evidence that Sinwar and the others received salaries is that “the P.A. specifically changed the law in order to cater to these people,” Hirsch said, referring to a 2013 amendment to the Law of Prisoners following the Shalit deal, which required the P.A. to provide jobs to released security prisoners. If the P.A. couldn’t find them a job, it would supply a monthly sum.

Another provision in the amendments referred specifically to terrorists in the Shalit deal expelled from Judea, Samaria and Gaza, ensuring that they, too, would receive payment.

In Judea and Samaria, payments are made through standalone ATM machines. In Gaza, the P.A. provides payouts through authorized money lenders. The exact amount provided to imprisoned and released terrorists is unknown. Hirsch estimates it to be in the many hundreds of millions of shekels each year.

Hirsch hopes his study will provide a still stronger basis for lawsuits against the P.A. for its role in the Oct. 7 massacre. While thousands of such suits have been brought, their argument is that the P.A. rewarded the Hamas attackers through pay-for-slay. Hirsch said that it could be argued, as he does in the report, that the P.A. was the Hamas attackers’ employer.

“When you are employed by someone and you conduct an action which is perceived to be part of your employment, and that action causes damage, then your employer will be responsible for your action,” he explained. “The P.A. paid these terrorists because they were terrorists.”

Noting that P.A. chief Mahmoud Abbas has since called for the release of all the terrorists, Hirsch said, “Not only did he employ them for being terrorists, but he has actually taken them under his wing and is fighting for their release.”

Get the latest updates in our WhatsApp group.