Professor wins UK anti-Zionism appeal, but court rejects blanket protection

The UK Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a ruling that the anti-Zionist beliefs of former University of Bristol professor Dr. David Miller, as specifically defined in his case, qualify as protected philosophical beliefs under the Equality Act 2010. Miller was dismissed in October 2021 for gross misconduct following comments made in February 2021, including stating that "the enemy we face here is Zionism." The EAT found that Miller's specific beliefs—that political Zionism is inherently racist, imperialistic, and colonial, and must be opposed—met the criteria for protection, including being "worthy of respect in a democratic society."

• The EAT also upheld that Miller's dismissal was discriminatory because it was a disproportionate response, although the university had legitimate aims in dismissing him.
• However, the ruling does not establish blanket protection for all anti-Zionist beliefs, only for those that satisfy the specific Grainger criteria.
• Miller's compensation will be reduced by 50% due to his blameworthy conduct, including aggressive comments towards student societies.
• Jonathan Turner of UK Lawyers for Israel clarified that the decision was based on Miller's particular description of anti-Zionism and does not mean all forms are protected. He added that legitimate forms of Zionism are also protected under the Equality Act.