Riyadh is learning the difference between a defense pact and a strategic partner
Saudi Arabia cannot expect Israel’s strategic help while keeping it at arm’s length politically.
Saudi Arabia is facing intensified Houthi attacks, testing its recent Mecca Joint Defense Agreement with Turkey and Pakistan. While Pakistan offered only condemnation, and Turkey expressed willingness to help without direct military involvement, the article highlights the difference between a defense pact and a strategic partner capable of immediate action. Israel, possessing operational experience, intelligence superiority, initiative, and a willingness to take military risks, is presented as a crucial potential partner against shared threats, primarily Iran and its proxies. The article argues that Israel should not offer unconditional assistance, but rather seek political reciprocity from Saudi Arabia, starting with public acknowledgment of Israel as a legitimate regional partner. Subsequent steps could include formal dialogue, expanded economic and civil contacts, and increased security cooperation, all leading towards full normalization and a genuine strategic relationship. The Palestinian issue, while a stated obstacle for Riyadh, should not entirely block a relationship serving Saudi national security interests. The author concludes that Saudi Arabia must decide if Israel is merely a capable neighbor or a legitimate strategic partner, and that this choice cannot remain entirely private, especially when facing serious military threats.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.