University of Washington delays vote on student conduct code changes
The University of Washington has delayed consideration of proposed revisions to its Student Conduct Code that were scheduled to go before the public school’s Board of Regents on Sept. 9.The university proposed the changes following concerns about its handling of campus antisemitism and destructive anti-Israel protests, including the May 2025 occupation and vandalism of the Interdisciplinary Engineering Building in Seattle. University officials estimated the damage at about $1 million. Prosecutors subsequently filed first-degree criminal trespass charges against 33 people arrested in connection with the occupation.Among the proposed changes are revisions to definitions of prohibited conduct, including disruption, failure to comply and unauthorized access to university property. The changes would also update the appeals process to allow specialized expertise in non-academic misconduct cases.Robert Jones, president of the university, announced the delay in a Sept. 1 letter to Faculty Senate leaders Rania Hussein, Amanda Kost and Gautham Reddy, citing requests for more…
The University of Washington has postponed a vote by its Board of Regents on proposed revisions to its Student Conduct Code, originally scheduled for September 9. This delay follows criticism regarding the university's response to antisemitism and destructive anti-Israel protests, including a May 2025 occupation and vandalism of the Interdisciplinary Engineering Building that caused an estimated $1 million in damages. Thirty-three individuals were charged with first-degree criminal trespass in connection with that incident. University President Robert Jones stated, "I acknowledge that members of the UW community are requesting more time to review the proposed revisions to the code and offer input." The Faculty Senate has until December 10 to provide feedback, with additional input sought from students and staff. The proposed changes aim to update definitions of prohibited conduct and revise the appeals process for non-academic misconduct cases.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.