When 'genocide' is no longer enough: Why the Palestinians are pushing 'wholocide' – analysis
Ambassador Al-Aklouk said the neologism 'Wholocide' was inspired by the "genocide victims themselves who described what they endured as being like 'the horrors of the Day of Judgment."
The Permanent Arab Committee for Human Rights (PACHR) has proposed the adoption of a new term, "Wholocide," to describe Israel's actions against Palestinians, arguing that "genocide" is no longer sufficient. This initiative, supported by Palestine's Permanent Representative to the League of Arab States, Ambassador Muhannad al-Aklouk, aims to establish a shared collective memory, document alleged crimes, and support legal efforts. Ambassador al-Aklouk stated that the term was inspired by victims who described their experiences as "the horrors of the Day of Judgment" and urged various institutions to adopt it.
- This push for "Wholocide" reflects a broader escalation in language used to describe the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, moving from "occupation" (1967) to "ethnic cleansing" (1990s), "apartheid" (2000s), and "genocide" (post-October 7).
- The term "Wholocide" is seen as an attempt to create a Palestinian historical concept parallel to the Holocaust, with "Wholo" echoing "Holo," aiming to portray Israel's alleged actions as surpassing even genocide.
- The goal is to shape collective memory, influence future interpretations of the conflict, and strengthen international identification with the Palestinian cause.
The summary and context on this page were written by the Din Online desk based on the original article; any quotes are from the source. The full article and all rights to it remain with the source. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.