שבת, נובמבר 7, 2026 עברית|English Log in Free sign-up
LIVE
Eisenkot moves closer to ousting Netanyahu, what could come next for Israel?El-Sayed lost Jewish support over Israel, antisemitism, but got over 50% of Jewish votes – reportTrump confirms new US strikes on Iran’s Qeshm IslandIsrael's elections are running to a new scramble to build coalition governmentBereaved families' forum seeks Shin Bet probe into alleged Ra'am voter-tracking appShin Bet power struggle rattles Israel as election crisis deepensIsrael stocks higher at close of trade; TA 35 up 3.09%Turkey is supporting Iraqi attempts to combat ISIS threats to Kirkuk, other regionsEisenkot in Israel trying to form govtIranian military claims it’s now ‘stronger’ than at start of war with Israel and USTrump says US launched ‘minor’ strikes on Iran targeting ‘a little bit of an anti-aircraft device’Eisenkot moves closer to ousting Netanyahu. Here’s what could come next.Eisenkot moves closer to ousting Netanyahu, what could come next for Israel?El-Sayed lost Jewish support over Israel, antisemitism, but got over 50% of Jewish votes – reportTrump confirms new US strikes on Iran’s Qeshm IslandIsrael's elections are running to a new scramble to build coalition governmentBereaved families' forum seeks Shin Bet probe into alleged Ra'am voter-tracking appShin Bet power struggle rattles Israel as election crisis deepensIsrael stocks higher at close of trade; TA 35 up 3.09%Turkey is supporting Iraqi attempts to combat ISIS threats to Kirkuk, other regionsEisenkot in Israel trying to form govtIranian military claims it’s now ‘stronger’ than at start of war with Israel and USTrump says US launched ‘minor’ strikes on Iran targeting ‘a little bit of an anti-aircraft device’Eisenkot moves closer to ousting Netanyahu. Here’s what could come next.
Security

Where did the post-9/11 war on terror go wrong?

ספט 9, 2026 ·  Source: JNS 85Objectivity score85/100

Given its hyperactive start, some observers probably predicted that by Sept. 11, 2026, the terrorist threat would be reduced to a few minor disturbances.

💬 Want to join the discussion and comment? Sign up — free, and get the weekly digest too.
🗞️ In-depth summary

The global “War on Terror,” initiated by U.N. Security Council Resolution 1373 on September 28, 2001, aimed to prevent and suppress international terrorism following the 9/11 attacks. Despite its legally binding nature and initial widespread adoption, terrorism remains an evolving threat. The resolution's implementation faltered due to three main factors:

  • Certain U.N. member states, including Iran, North Korea, and Myanmar, actively rejected its mandates, with Iran becoming a leading state sponsor of terrorism.
  • Other member states, such as Qatar and Turkey, demonstrated a lack of commitment, maintaining inadequate compliance programs and even facilitating terrorist financing.
  • A significant dispute over the definition of “terrorism” emerged, with some organizations and nations arguing that “armed struggle” for “self-determination” is not terrorism, creating loopholes that allow militants to thrive.

This fragmented approach has allowed terrorism to expand geographically and in attack volume, as evidenced by the “Axis of Resistance” network, which launched a Middle East war on October 7, 2023.

Automatically generated summary based on the original article; quotes are from the source.
This story is based on reporting by JNS.
Read the full article at the source →
🏷

© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.

Related

Discussion

No comments yet — be the first to comment.

Add a comment