Blockades and fees: Why are the US’s actions in Hormuz legal while Iran’s are not? – interview
Though US President Donald Trump has since abandoned the idea, he suggested that vessels should pay a 20% fee on all cargo transiting the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for US military protection.
According to Adv. Yoav Harris, the legality of blockades in the Strait of Hormuz hinges on adherence to international law, specifically the San Remo Manual and UNCLOS. While the US's blockade could be legal if it meets criteria like impartiality, effectiveness, and allowing humanitarian aid, Iran's actions are deemed illegal. Iran's blockade, announced March 4, 2026, is problematic because it failed to distinguish between enemy and neutral vessels, targeting all ships allegedly not coordinating with the regime. Harris stated, "If we look into what Iran did here, it was simply firing at vessels going through the Strait of Hormuz. It has no basis in international law. It is very close to what is defined as piracy." Additionally, Iran's intention to charge compulsory fees for transit and security services, even for routes closer to Oman, violates international law, as services cannot be forced upon vessels.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.