Stanford student paper wins ruling against Trump administration’s speech-based deportation policy
“Tomorrow, or perhaps even today, targets may include anyone in the United States who exercises their freedom of speech to simply express opinions the government does not like,” U.S. District Judge Noël Wise wrote in her ruling.
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Review: The Ultimate Budget Fitness Tracker for 2026
See the review →
On August 28, a federal judge ruled in favor of The Stanford Daily, Stanford University's student newspaper, in its lawsuit against the Trump administration's policy of using immigration laws to penalize noncitizens for protected speech, including reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. U.S. District Judge Noël Wise found two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act unconstitutional as applied to protected speech, violating the First and Fifth Amendments. The lawsuit, filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and Van Der Hout LLP, challenged provisions allowing the U.S. Secretary of State to revoke visas and initiate deportation for speech deemed to "compromise a compelling foreign policy interest." The case arose after international students at The Daily reportedly feared immigration consequences for covering sensitive political issues. Judge Wise stated, "freedom of speech belongs to the people" and that the government cannot remove it from citizens or noncitizens, noting the policy created a chilling effect.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.