Stanford student paper wins ruling against Trump administration’s speech-based deportation policy

A federal judge ruled in favor of The Stanford Daily, the student paper of Stanford University, on Aug. 28 in its lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s use of immigration laws to punish noncitizens for protected speech, including reporting and commentary about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.Noël Wise, a U.S. district judge for the Northern District of California, ruled that two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act are unconstitutional as applied to protected speech, finding violations of the First and Fifth amendments. The court ruled for The Daily on six of the eight claims.The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, along with the law firm Van Der Hout LLP, filed the suit on Aug. 6, 2025, on behalf of the student newspaper and two noncitizen students. The lawsuit challenged provisions allowing the U.S. secretary of state to revoke a noncitizen’s visa and to initiate deportation proceedings when the person’s speech is determined…
On August 28, a federal judge ruled in favor of The Stanford Daily, Stanford University's student newspaper, in its lawsuit against the Trump administration's policy of using immigration laws to penalize noncitizens for protected speech, including reporting on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. U.S. District Judge Noël Wise found two provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act unconstitutional as applied to protected speech, violating the First and Fifth Amendments. The lawsuit, filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and Van Der Hout LLP, challenged provisions allowing the U.S. Secretary of State to revoke visas and initiate deportation for speech deemed to "compromise a compelling foreign policy interest." The case arose after international students at The Daily reportedly feared immigration consequences for covering sensitive political issues. Judge Wise stated, "freedom of speech belongs to the people" and that the government cannot remove it from citizens or noncitizens, noting the policy created a chilling effect.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.