Where did the post-9/11 war on terror go wrong?
Given its hyperactive start, some observers probably predicted that by Sept. 11, 2026, the terrorist threat would be reduced to a few minor disturbances.
The global “War on Terror,” initiated by U.N. Security Council Resolution 1373 on September 28, 2001, aimed to prevent and suppress international terrorism following the 9/11 attacks. Despite its legally binding nature and initial widespread adoption, terrorism remains an evolving threat. The resolution's implementation faltered due to three main factors:
- Certain U.N. member states, including Iran, North Korea, and Myanmar, actively rejected its mandates, with Iran becoming a leading state sponsor of terrorism.
- Other member states, such as Qatar and Turkey, demonstrated a lack of commitment, maintaining inadequate compliance programs and even facilitating terrorist financing.
- A significant dispute over the definition of “terrorism” emerged, with some organizations and nations arguing that “armed struggle” for “self-determination” is not terrorism, creating loopholes that allow militants to thrive.
This fragmented approach has allowed terrorism to expand geographically and in attack volume, as evidenced by the “Axis of Resistance” network, which launched a Middle East war on October 7, 2023.
© All rights to the original article belong to the source. Din Online shows a headline, an excerpt and a link only. The objectivity rating is computed automatically and is an estimate only.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to comment.